Portable teaching device for CICT
|Item type||Current location||Collection||Call number||Copy number||Status||Date due||Barcode|
|Undergrad Research||College of Information and Communication Technology Thesis and Dissertation||Research||TK 5105.585 Pa23 2011 (Browse shelf)||1||Withdrawn Not for loan||000008469|
Includes bibliographical references and appendices
Technology is being used to do specific work that will be beneficial to many and may replace the traditional ways. With proper motivation plus extreme need innovating became an extreme in need to develop a new device that will lessen a work of everyone need. The developers of this project aims to solve problems in delivering good quality of education and make an appealing approach to it. We intend to help our instructors and other presenters to discuss easier using this project by creating a presentation and displaying it by using the projects net book and projector, just like presenting in seminars.
In doing this, many students will appreciate an appealing manner of learning, an appealing manner of learning, and will find appreciation in learning. And teachers/instructor can boost the interest of their students in an improve way of teaching. In developing the project the researchers gathered information about the feasibility of the project, for assurance that the project in future may exist by the availability of the materials needed. They used research instrument in developing the project such as data gathering procedures and techniques. This may help in addition what has been developed in the project, looking referring to other conceptualized these.
With regards to fabricating the project and choosing the hardware and software requirements to fulfill the project target approach. Like in software requirements, choosing the latest and the best operating and memory system for faster operation and memory system for the tablet PC, is for the storage of the files and for faster operation and usage of the project. In addition, the developers included peripherals such as optical drive, USB port and card reader for another resources of data. A projector was added to the project for better presentations, the projector used to be stand alone (it has an USB port, built-in speaker, memory slot and detachable battery). For better sounds, they included a 190Watts speaker with an amplifier of 400 watts and a power supply, Also, a wireless lapel for better delivery of the discussion. Together with a wireless presenter there will be no interruption in the flow of the presentation can be manipulated in distance. All of the components are embedded in the casing and it is made of fiber, which secures all the components embedded to it. And it is easy to be carried because the proponents attach wheels to it.
In fabricating the project the developers used tools and equipment’s to secure the safety and accurateness of their work. They used axed saw, electric drill, long nose, multi tester, pliers, screw driver, soldering iron and lead, thermal paste, T-square and wires.
In order to maintain the project on its present state the proponents of the project provide a user’s manual. There included all of the safety precaution for the users and for the project itself, especially for the sensitive electric device in it, together with the operation and maintenance guidelines in using any specific components in the project.
The acceptability of the project is based on the accumulated result of the respondents, on different categories the general rate and result of the project as to the respondents. In terms of functionality, the project has a total rate of 4.3 and the equivalent is acceptable. In terms of reliability, 4.19 that are acceptable too. In usability, 4.38 and the result are acceptable too. In portability and safety the project got 4.29 that results too acceptable. In terms of main ability the project has a total rate of 4.32 this means that the project is very acceptable in terms of the criterion. In terms of workability the project got 4.39 that signify that the project is acceptable by means of workability criteria. Lastly in terms of training and documentation the project got a 4.21 rating it means that the project is acceptable in terms of this criterion. The overall rating of the project is 4.30 it means that the project is acceptable to the users.